1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

SOLVED How to properly smooth physical layer with 3DS Max?

Discussion in 'Tracks' started by JoaquinPS21, Dec 8, 2017.

  1. JoaquinPS21

    JoaquinPS21 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2017
    Likes Received:
    2
    Working on the same conversion I asked about a few weeks ago, I decided to add a physical layer for the track, kerbs and the grass which is most close to the track; because using the visual layer as physical was pretty bad, and extremly bumpy. I extracted the track mesh and in 3DS Max, I used subdivision with NURMS and then Pro optimizer, this solved the problems a bit, but there are still some really bumpy areas, such as the two main straights you can see here

    [​IMG]

    Here it is the mesh structure

    [​IMG]

    Anyone has worked the physical layer with 3DS Max before? I'm looking forward to any advice to solve this, searched in a lot of ways in the forums but I didn't find any specific information, in a post I read that LilSKi will do a tutorial about this, but I didn't found it.
     
  2. Johnr777

    Johnr777 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2017
    Likes Received:
    50
    That's a tough one because of the many ways to go about it. You are definitely on the right path! How much subdivision are you using? My last layout I had a good physical mesh using 0.7m subdivision and then using pro-optimize after.
     
  3. JoaquinPS21

    JoaquinPS21 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2017
    Likes Received:
    2
    Hmm, maybe I'm not using the same subdivision, because the only option I have here (and play with) is the iterations. And if that's right then I first used 2 iterations (really low poly 3D model) and then Pro Optimizer

    [​IMG]

    Also I checked the Modifier list, and there is another Subdivision modifier a some other smoothing modifiers, which I don't know about to (Turbo Smooth, Smooth)
     
  4. Johnr777

    Johnr777 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2017
    Likes Received:
    50
    The second one found in the modifiers list is the one that will give control by measurement, and don’t use the smooth modifiers , stick with the pro-opt for better results
     
  5. JoaquinPS21

    JoaquinPS21 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2017
    Likes Received:
    2
    I used the subdivision modifier indicated with 0.5 subdivision, it solved pretty much the bumps, there are still some areas with some bumps, but they are minor. Thanks for the help!
     
  6. Pixelchaser

    Pixelchaser Well-Known Member ACM Club Driver

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2015
    Likes Received:
    796
    using max myself and from what i see and having been there myself ...i would say this is "not" how to go about it. the only way ive been able to create a "good & proper" physical track from the visual is by having the visual set up a certain way.

    it needs to have square quads to start with. equilateral edges on those quads...

    what you have will work , but its wasteful and not actually how to do it. once you have square ish quads as much as possible. simple subdivide is good and a bit of pro optimise if necessary and then more subdivide. always keeping the borders safe.
     
  7. JoaquinPS21

    JoaquinPS21 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2017
    Likes Received:
    2
    Interesting, that would probably solve the minor bumps I got in certain areas of the track
    I will take a look on that, thanks @Pixelchaser
     
  8. Pixelchaser

    Pixelchaser Well-Known Member ACM Club Driver

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2015
    Likes Received:
    796
    point to note is that your not really removing any bumps. your just giving it frequency to traverse the bumps better.
     
    JoaquinPS21 likes this.